Effect Of Australian Aid On Managing Wash †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Effect Of Australian Aid On Managing Wash? Answer: Introduction The Water sanitation and hygiene or WASH is identified as one of the major aspect which is to be considered, while managing the health and sanitation of the people. The special focus of this research work is mainly identified in reference to the health of women and children of Australia. Providing a quality life and supporting the health and sanitation is identified as the primary step towards the development and growth of any country. The article which got selected for the discussion is considered as the most promising article which aims for providing definite assistance for managing the health and sanitation. Through this article, there are various services and help provided on a wide landscape. To improve the current scenario related to the water sanitation and hygiene, various major steps are taken into consideration. The budget of 47.9 million dollars is also allotted for the development and improvement related to the growth aspects. The major sections that are covered below are mainly related to the literature review, results and the specific discussion which is being carried for drawing the specific conclusions (Jimenez, et al., 2014). Literature Review The WASH project is considered as one of the highlighted project of Australia, which helps in promoting various growth aspects related to Australia. According to the consolidated article identified from different sources, specific aid program is designed in an appropriate direction. According to one of the article defined by Australias overseas aid and development assistance program, the four set of recommendations are defined for the improvement aspects. Those four recommendations are allocation of the Australias specific process of management, identification of the universal goals and targets, management of the vulnerable communities of Australia and the last goal is the management of integrated water and sanitation related to the hygiene. Apart from these four goals, the water impact, hygiene sanitation can be managed and analyzed. The hygiene crisis can also be considered on a wide level (Campbell, et al., 2017). Apart from this, the second article is derived for the water sanitation and hygiene aspects. The article is majorly defined by the Alezandro Jimnej, Moa Cortobious and Kjellen. The basic purpose to derive this article is to identify the different levels of sanitation on definite basis. The main focus of the article is mainly switched towards the indigenous people and surviving of their specific life styles. The different types of exercises related to WASH are identified at an initial level. The geographic scope for sanitation and hygiene is also determined on a well-defined level. The major role of the government agencies in managing the WASH is also specified on a broad level (Savage, et al., 2014). After considering both these articles, it is clear that the suitable initiatives are being planned on a wide level to reach a suitable target. The thorough research work also aids in providing basic initiatives for definite improvement. Results As the description is mainly originated form the article, so the result can also be derived on the basis of the articles managed. To judge the results for the WASH, different parameters are essential to be judged. On the basis of these parameters, the question for survey is assumed and calculated. The research topic for the survey is the effect of Australian aid on managing WASH for the development of the country. Apart from considering this question, it is also important to consider basic aid provided to the country for the mutual development and cooperation (Australian Government, 2017). The survey is conducted among the child and women who belongs to different rural areas of the country. They help in providing assistance and feedback for the specific results. After considering the different articles and specific journals, one journal is assumed on the basis of perceptions. The specific perceptions are shown below. The table shown below is purely based on the perceptions derived. Criteria to be discussed Perceptions Total involvement of individuals. Aid provided for the WASH Maximum facilities are provided through the different provided materials. Nearly 75% Gaps in the services provided to the consumers. The gap can be filled by providing best facilities to the poor. Nearly 80% Civil society WASH fund These funds are invested for the development and improvement of the women. Nearly 79% By assuming these aspects, it is quite clear that to implement basic perspectives related to the country, the specific planning is considered on the highest priority. The most specific process related to the WASH can be calculated on a wide landscape. On the basis of assumptions, the three criteria are considered for the discussion. These three criteria totally depend upon the perceptions and total involvement of the individuals for further identifications. All these three aspects have their definite impact on the individual level (McMullan Davies , 2017). Effect of assistance The ministry of foreign affairs in Australia is bounded to provide specific assistance for the improvement in definite direction. The DFAT and Civil society organizations programs are helpful in providing assistance for the specific improvement process. The wide range of multilateral partners are continuously focusing towards the WASH services. Impact of Gaps The Gaps are creating a negative impact on the process of improvement. The specific strategies are not planned due to the insufficient aspects identified by the organization. So, to fill the gaps, appropriate planning is essential. Impact of civil society WASH Funds The civil society WASH funds are continuously supporting the washing and sanitation activities related to the society on a broad level. The world health organization and UNICEF also merges in a collaborative manner to find definite approaches for the improvement (Fewtrell, et al., 2007) Discussion/ Interpretation After discussing the different results related to the article, the different parameters are also assumed. The first parameter for the WASH is considered as the Risk of implementation of the project and second parameter is related to the unorganized supporting factors. The discussion can be done on different impacts. The aid can be improved by providing specific assistance in the correct direction. By planning specific approaches for the health, sanitation and hygiene, the specific attempts can be planned for the improvement. The Water for Women Fund and specific funds for the improvement of hygiene are imposed on large scale. This will help in providing an organized assistance. To fill the gaps, various strategies are planned in specific directions. According to the article, for working with the government partners, civil society organizations and involvement of the multilateral partners are helpful in initiating various steps for the improvement. The issues related to the WASH can easily be solved widespread. There are various grant and services provided which may help in filling the gaps for the improvement (WaterAid Team, 2017). The third aspect which is to be discussed is related to the civil society WASH funds. These funds and services are considered as one of the aspect which may help in improving current status related to the WASH. DFAT plays the most prominent role in providing services in the correct direction. There are various online training packages and services provided to the consumers, which will simultaneously support in providing assistance. By defining the discussions and interpretation, it is quite clear that to implement WASH on a wide level, suitable attempts are essential to be planned in the right manne References Australian Government, 2017. Overview of Australia's assistance for water, sanitation and hygiene. [Online] Available at: https://dfat.gov.au/aid/topics/investment-priorities/education-health/water-sanitation-hygeine/Pages/water-sanitation-and-hygiene.aspx Campbell, S., Nery, S., Wardell, R. DEste, D., 2017. Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) and environmental risk factors for soil-transmitted helminth intensity of infection in Timor-Leste, using real time PCR. PLOS journal, 11(3). Fewtrell, L., Bos, R., Gore, F. Bartram, G., 2007. Water, sanitation and hygiene: Quantifying the health impact at national and local levels in countries with incomplete water supply and sanitation coverage: WHO, Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43763/1/9789241595759_eng.pdf Jimenez, A., Cortobius, M. Kjellen, M., 2014. Water, sanitation and hygiene and indigenous peoples: a review of the literature. Water International journal, 39(3), pp. 277-293. McMullan, B. Davies , R., 2017. Water and sanitation in Australias aid program: building it back better, Available at: https://devpolicy.org/water-sanitation-australias-aid-program-building-back-better-20170215/ Savage, G., Campbell, S., Atkinson, J. Magalhes, R., 2014. Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH): A Critical Component for Sustainable Soil-Transmitted Helminth and Schistosomiasis Control. PLOS journal, 8(4). WaterAid Team, 2017. Hygiene: Hand washing alone could cut the risk of diarrhoea almost in half, saving hundreds of lives every day. [Online] Available at: https://www.wateraid.org/au/what-we-do/the-crisis/hygiene